<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>A Logical Approach to the Sports Wagering Market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:01:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: am19psu</title>
		<link>http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013&#038;cpage=1#comment-3671</link>
		<dc:creator>am19psu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013#comment-3671</guid>
		<description>Those are both good points.

I&#039;ve obviously thought about the idea as well, but not from this angle. My biggest problem at this point is defining the best sides early on.

On my blog, I play most, but not all of my Tuesday strong leans. If I was betting 100% of them, I would argue that I should be placing them on Tuesday.

I&#039;ll be interested to see how my thought experiment plays out at the end of the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are both good points.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve obviously thought about the idea as well, but not from this angle. My biggest problem at this point is defining the best sides early on.</p>
<p>On my blog, I play most, but not all of my Tuesday strong leans. If I was betting 100% of them, I would argue that I should be placing them on Tuesday.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to see how my thought experiment plays out at the end of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneyline</title>
		<link>http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013&#038;cpage=1#comment-3670</link>
		<dc:creator>moneyline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013#comment-3670</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s an indication of big money coming in on your side, which is obviously great, but you are losing value.&quot;

My thoughts exactly.  These lines only have so much value to begin with.  If a number moves 2 full points then how much value could possibly be left?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s an indication of big money coming in on your side, which is obviously great, but you are losing value.&#8221;</p>
<p>My thoughts exactly.  These lines only have so much value to begin with.  If a number moves 2 full points then how much value could possibly be left?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneyline</title>
		<link>http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013&#038;cpage=1#comment-3669</link>
		<dc:creator>moneyline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013#comment-3669</guid>
		<description>The former.  And yes it runs counter to something that has been a huge part of my style for years.

In about a month or so contrarian angles is going to be revived, and I am going to start thinking out loud about this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The former.  And yes it runs counter to something that has been a huge part of my style for years.</p>
<p>In about a month or so contrarian angles is going to be revived, and I am going to start thinking out loud about this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonny</title>
		<link>http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013&#038;cpage=1#comment-3668</link>
		<dc:creator>jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013#comment-3668</guid>
		<description>I honestly like lines that don&#039;t budge moreso than ones that shift like the first scenario adam laid out.

It&#039;s an indication of big money coming in on your side, which is obviously great, but you are losing value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly like lines that don&#8217;t budge moreso than ones that shift like the first scenario adam laid out.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an indication of big money coming in on your side, which is obviously great, but you are losing value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: am19psu</title>
		<link>http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013&#038;cpage=1#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>am19psu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themoneylinejournal.com/?p=1013#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I am starting to question the wisdom of betting into lines that have already moved significantly in the direction that I am looking to side with.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do you mean betting into a -11 line that was once -8 or betting into a -11 line that was once -14? Because the former would cause me to rethink a lot of what I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I am starting to question the wisdom of betting into lines that have already moved significantly in the direction that I am looking to side with.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you mean betting into a -11 line that was once -8 or betting into a -11 line that was once -14? Because the former would cause me to rethink a lot of what I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
